<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Michelin Pilot Sport PS2</title> <atom:link href="http://tractionreview.com/michelin-pilot-sport-ps2-19/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://tractionreview.com/michelin-pilot-sport-ps2-19/</link> <description>Tire Ratings for Enthusiasts by Enthusiasts</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 01:07:17 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator> <item><title>By: admin</title><link>http://tractionreview.com/michelin-pilot-sport-ps2-19/#comment-12</link> <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 04:21:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://tractionreview.com/michelin-pilot-sport-ps2-19/#comment-12</guid> <description>I have these on my 2004 M3 in 225/40/19 up front and 255/35/19 in the rear.I have been very pleased with these tires. They have been on the car over a year now and still have plenty of tread left. And my M3 is not a garage-carâ€¦ itâ€™s my daily driver. The rears are starting to show signs that itâ€™s coming up on time to replace, but they still have a little life left above the wear bars. The fronts are still over 50% tread life and should last me a whole other season.Being a daily driver, rain traction is a huge consideration for me. I want the best tire in the dry, but I also donâ€™t want to have to do 30 in the rain on the highway.The Ps2 does this and more. Itâ€™s very stable in the worst of wet conditions. It has enough tread life to keep me happy (hey, it is a 220 treadware tire after all) and the dry grip is more than sufficient.Iâ€™ve been debating these to run as another set, or to try out the RE050 pole positions. the PP are a little cheaper, and from what iâ€™ve seen, they might even be a little better in the dry. But, I havenâ€™t heard too many reviews on the wet characteristics. I would love to hear from someone else who has used both. Please leave a comment here. I check back here all the time.Thanks!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have these on my 2004 M3 in 225/40/19 up front and 255/35/19 in the rear.</p><p>I have been very pleased with these tires. They have been on the car over a year now and still have plenty of tread left. And my M3 is not a garage-carâ€¦ itâ€™s my daily driver. The rears are starting to show signs that itâ€™s coming up on time to replace, but they still have a little life left above the wear bars. The fronts are still over 50% tread life and should last me a whole other season.</p><p>Being a daily driver, rain traction is a huge consideration for me. I want the best tire in the dry, but I also donâ€™t want to have to do 30 in the rain on the highway.</p><p>The Ps2 does this and more. Itâ€™s very stable in the worst of wet conditions. It has enough tread life to keep me happy (hey, it is a 220 treadware tire after all) and the dry grip is more than sufficient.</p><p>Iâ€™ve been debating these to run as another set, or to try out the RE050 pole positions. the PP are a little cheaper, and from what iâ€™ve seen, they might even be a little better in the dry. But, I havenâ€™t heard too many reviews on the wet characteristics. I would love to hear from someone else who has used both. Please leave a comment here. I check back here all the time.</p><p>Thanks!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using xcache
Page Caching using xcache
Database Caching 2/3 queries in 0.001 seconds using disk
Object Caching 223/223 objects using xcache
Content Delivery Network via cdn.tractionreview.info

Served from: tractionreview.com @ 2012-05-21 06:33:30 -->
