<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michelin Pilot Sport PS2</title>
	<link>http://tractionreview.com/michelin-pilot-sport-ps2-19/</link>
	<description>Tire Ratings for Enthusiasts by Enthusiasts</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 07:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://tractionreview.com/michelin-pilot-sport-ps2-19/#comment-12</link>
		<author>admin</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 04:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://tractionreview.com/michelin-pilot-sport-ps2-19/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>I have these on my 2004 M3 in 225/40/19 up front and 255/35/19 in the rear.

I have been very pleased with these tires. They have been on the car over a year now and still have plenty of tread left. And my M3 is not a garage-car… it’s my daily driver. The rears are starting to show signs that it’s coming up on time to replace, but they still have a little life left above the wear bars. The fronts are still over 50% tread life and should last me a whole other season.

Being a daily driver, rain traction is a huge consideration for me. I want the best tire in the dry, but I also don’t want to have to do 30 in the rain on the highway.

The Ps2 does this and more. It’s very stable in the worst of wet conditions. It has enough tread life to keep me happy (hey, it is a 220 treadware tire after all) and the dry grip is more than sufficient.

I’ve been debating these to run as another set, or to try out the RE050 pole positions. the PP are a little cheaper, and from what i’ve seen, they might even be a little better in the dry. But, I haven’t heard too many reviews on the wet characteristics. I would love to hear from someone else who has used both. Please leave a comment here. I check back here all the time.

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have these on my 2004 M3 in 225/40/19 up front and 255/35/19 in the rear.</p>
<p>I have been very pleased with these tires. They have been on the car over a year now and still have plenty of tread left. And my M3 is not a garage-car… it’s my daily driver. The rears are starting to show signs that it’s coming up on time to replace, but they still have a little life left above the wear bars. The fronts are still over 50% tread life and should last me a whole other season.</p>
<p>Being a daily driver, rain traction is a huge consideration for me. I want the best tire in the dry, but I also don’t want to have to do 30 in the rain on the highway.</p>
<p>The Ps2 does this and more. It’s very stable in the worst of wet conditions. It has enough tread life to keep me happy (hey, it is a 220 treadware tire after all) and the dry grip is more than sufficient.</p>
<p>I’ve been debating these to run as another set, or to try out the RE050 pole positions. the PP are a little cheaper, and from what i’ve seen, they might even be a little better in the dry. But, I haven’t heard too many reviews on the wet characteristics. I would love to hear from someone else who has used both. Please leave a comment here. I check back here all the time.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
